Islam
& Chirstianity
IS JESUS
REALLY GOD?
Without a doubt, you have often heard the claim that Jesus is God, the
second person in the "Holy Trinity." However, the very Bible which is used as a
basis for knowledge about Jesus and as the basis for doctrine within Christianity clearly
belies this claim. We urge you to consult your own Bible and verify that the following
conclusions are not drawn out of context:
1. God is All Knowing...but Jesus was not.
When speaking of the Day of
Judgement, Jesus clearly gave evidence of a
limitation on his knowledge when he said, "but of that day and hour knoweth no man,
no, not the angels which are in Heaven, neither the son, but the Father." (Mark 13:32
and Matt 24:36) But God knows all. His knowledge is without any limitations. That Jesus,
of his own admission, did not know when the Day of Judgement would be, is clear proof that
Jesus is not all-knowing, and that Jesus is therefore not God.
2. God is All-Powerful...but Jesus was not.
While Jesus performed many miracles, he himself admitted that the power
he had was not his own, but derived from God. He said, "Verily I say unto you, the
Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do..." (John 5:19) Again
he said, "I can of mine own self do nothing: As I hear I judge, and my judgement is
just because I seek not mine own will but the will of the Father which has sent me."
(John 5:30) But God is not only all-powerful, He is also the source of all power and
authority. That Jesus, of his own admission, could do nothing on his own is clear proof
that Jesus is not all-powerful, and that therefore Jesus is not God.
3. God does not have a God...but Jesus did have a God.
God is the ultimate judge and refuge for all, and He does not call upon
nor pray to any others. But Jesus acknowledged that there was one whom he worshipped and
to whom he prayed when he said, "I ascend unto my Father and your Father, and to my
God and your God." (John 20:17) He is also reported to have cried out while on the
cross, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" (Matt 27:46) If Jesus were
God, then couldn't this be read "Myself, myself, why hast thou forsaken me?"
Would that not be pure nonsense? When Jesus prayed the Lord's prayer (Luke 11:2-4) was he
praying to himself? When in the garden of Gethsemane he prayed, "O my Father, if it
be possible, let this cup pass from me: Nevertheless, not as I will but as thou
wilt." (Matt 26:36-39) Was Jesus praying to himself? That Jesus, of his own
admission, and by his own actions, acknowledged, worshipped and prayed to another being as
God, is clear proof that Jesus himself is not God.
4. According to the Bible, God is invisible to humans...but Jesus
was flesh and blood.
While thousands saw Jesus and heard his voice, Jesus himself said that
this could not be done with God when he said, " No man hath seen God at any
time." (John 1:18) "Ye have neither heard His voice at any time nor seen His
shape." (John 5:37) He also said in John 4:24, "God is a spirit and they that
worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth." That Jesus would say that no
one had seen or heard God ant any time, while his followers both saw and heard him, is
clear proof that Jesus was not God.
5. No one is greater than God and no one can direct Him...but Jesus
acknowledged someone greater than himself whose will was distinct from his own.
Perhaps the clearest indication we have that Jesus and God are not
equal, and therefore not one and the same, come again from the mouth of Jesus himself who
said in John 14:28, "My Father is greater than I." When someone referred to him
as a "good master" in Luke 18:19, Jesus responded, "Why callest thou me
good? There is none good but one, that is God..." Further more, Jesus drew clear
distinctions between himself and God when he said, "I proceeded forth and came from
God, neither came I of myself but He sent me." (John 8:42) Jesus gave clear evidence
of his subordination to God, rather than his equality with God, when he said in Luke
22:42, "not my will but thine be done," and in John 5:30, "I seek not mine
own will but the will of the Father which has sent me." That Jesus would admit that
he did not come into the world on his own initiative but was directed to do so, that he
would acknowledge another being as greater than himself, and that he would negate his own
will in deference to affirming the will of another, give clear proof that Jesus is not the
Supreme One and therefore Jesus is not God.
Conclusion
The Church recognizes the Bible as the primary source of knowledge
about God and Jesus. But since the Bible makes it clear that Jesus is not the Supreme
Being and the Supreme Being is not Jesus, upon what basis have you come to believe
otherwise?
My brother or sister, the belief that the Supreme Being is a Trinity is
false and completely inconsistent with the words of Jesus as presented in the Bible. God
is One, not three. He is a perfect unity.
If you are interested in the truth about God and your relationship to
Him, we invite you to investigate the religion of Islam.
What is the word of God about Jesus?
A. Regarding the Sonship of Jesus:
That is Jesus, son of Mary, in word of truth, concerning which they are
doubting. It is not for God to take a son unto Him. Glory be to Him! When He decrees a
thing, He but says to it "Be", and it is. (Qur'an 19:34-35)
And they say, 'The All-Merciful has taken unto Himself a son.' You have
indeed advanced something hideous. The heavens are well nigh rent of it and the earth
split asunder, and the mountains well nigh fall down crashing for that they have
attributed to the All-Merciful to take a son. None is there in the heavens and earth but
he comes to the All-Merciful as a servant. (Qur'an 19:88-93)
Truly the likeness of Jesus, in God's sight, is as Adam's likeness; He
created him of dust, then said He unto him, "Be", and he was.
(Qur'an 3:59)
People of the Book, go not beyond the bounds in your religion, and say
not as to God but the Truth. The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was only the Messenger of
God, and His word that He committed to Mary, and a spirit from Him. So believe in God and
His Messengers, and say not 'Three', Refrain, better it is for you. God is only One God.
Glory be to Him - that He should have a son! To Him belongs all that is in the heavens and
in the earth, God suffices for a guardian.
B. Regarding Jesus being God.
And when God said, 'O Jesus, son of Mary, did you say unto men,
"Take me and my mother as gods, apart from God?" He said, 'To You be glory! It
is not mine to say what I have no right to. If I indeed said it, You knew it, knowing what
is within my soul, and I do not know what is within Your soul; You know the things unseen.
I only said to them what You did command me: "Serve God, my Lord and your Lord."
And I was a witness over them, while I remained among them; but when You did take me to
Yourself the Watcher over them; You are the witness over everything. (Qur'an 5:116-117)
C. Regarding the Crucifiction of Jesus.
And for their unbelief, and their uttering against Mary a mighty
calumny, and for their saying 'We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, the Messenger of
God'...yet they did not slay him, neither crucified him, only a likeness of that was shown
to them. Those who are at variance concerning him surely are in doubt regarding him, they
have no knowledge of him, except the following of surmise; and they did not slay him of
certainty...no indeed; God raised him up to Him; God is Almighty, All-Wise. There is not
one of the people of the Book but will assuredly believe in him before his death, and on
the Resurrection Day he will be a witness against them. (Qur'an
4:156-159)
WHO INVENTED THE TRINITY?
The three monotheistic religions-- Judaism,
Christianity, and Islam-- all purport to share one fundamental concept: belief in God as
the Supreme Being, the Creator and Sustainer of the Universe. Known as "tawhid"
in Islam, this concept of the Oneness of God was stressed by Moses in a Biblical passage
known as the "Shema", or the Jewish creed of faith: "Hear, O Israel: The
Lord our God is one Lord." (Deuteronomy 6:4)
It was repeated word-for-word approximately 1500 years later by Jesus
when he said "...The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; the Lord our
God is one Lord." (Mark 12:29)
Muhammad came along approximately 600 years later, bringing the same
message again: "And your God is One God: there is no God but He, ..." (The
Qur'an 2:163).
Christianity has digressed from the concept of the Oneness of God,
however, into a vague and mysterious doctrine that was formulated during the fourth
century. This doctrine, which continues to be a source of controversy both within and
without the Christian religion, is known as the Doctrine of the Trinity. Simply put, the
Christian doctrine of the Trinity states that God is the union of three divine persons--
the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit-- in one divine being.
If that concept, put in basic terms, sounds confusing, the flowery
language in the actual text of the doctrine lends even more mystery to the matter:
"...we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity...for
there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, another of the Holy Ghost is all
one...they are not three gods, but one God...the whole three persons are co-eternal and
co-equal...he therefore that will be saved must thus think of the Trinity..."
(excerpts from the Athanasian Creed).
Let's put this together in a different form: one person, God the Father
+ one person, God the Son, + one person, God the Holy Ghost = one person, God the What? Is
this English or is this gibberish?
It is said that Athanasius, the bishop who formulated this doctrine,
confessed that the more he wrote on the matter, the less capable he was of clearly
expressing his thoughts regarding it.
How did such a confusing doctrine get its start?
Trinity in the Bible
References in the Bible to a Trinity of divine beings are vague, at
best.
In Matthew 28:19, we find Jesus telling his disciples to go out and
preach to all nations. While this "Great Commission" does make mention of the
three persons who later become components of the Trinity, the phrase "...baptizing
them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" is quite
clearly an addition to Biblical text--that is, not the actual words of Jesus-- as can be
seen by two factors:
1) baptism in the early Church, as discussed by Paul in his letters,
was done only in the name of Jesus; and
2) the "Great Commission" was found in the first gospel
written, that of Mark, bears no mention of Father, Son and/or Holy Ghost--see Mark 16:15.
The only other reference in the Bible to a Trinity can be found in the
Epistle of I John 5:7. Biblical scholars of today, however, have admitted that the phrase
"... there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy
Ghost: and these three are one" is definitely a "later addition" to
Biblical text, and it is not found in any of today's versions of the Bible.
It can, therefore, be seen that the concept of a Trinity of divine
beings was not an idea put forth by Jesus or any other prophet of God. This doctrine, now
subscribed to by Christians all over the world, is entirely man-made in origin.
The Doctrine Takes Shape
While Paul of Tarsus, the man who could rightfully be considered the
true founder of Christianity, did formulate many of its doctrines, that of the Trinity was
not among them. He did, however, lay the groundwork for such when he put forth the idea of
Jesus being a "divine Son". After all, a Son does need a Father, and what about
a vehicle for God's revelations to man? In essence, Paul named the principal players, but
it was the later Church people who put the matter together.
Tertullian, a lawyer and presbyter of the third-century Church in
Carthage, was the first to use the word "Trinity" when he put forth the theory
that the Son and the Spirit participate in the being of God, but all are of one being of
substance with the Father.
A Formal Doctrine Is Drawn Up
When controversy over the matter of the Trinity blew up in 318 between
two church men from Alexandria--Arius, the deacon, and Alexander, his bishop-- Emperor
Constantine stepped into the fray.
Although Christian dogma was a complete mystery to him, he did realize
that a unified church was necessary for a strong kingdom. When negotiation failed to
settle the dispute, Constantine called for the first ecumenical council in Church history
in order to settle the matter once and for all.
Six weeks after the 300 bishops first gathered at Nicea in 325, the
doctrine of the Trinity was hammered out. The God of the Christians was now seen as having
three essences, or natures, in the form of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
The Church Puts Its Foot Down
The matter was far from settled, however, despite high hopes for such
on the part of Constantine. Arius and the new bishop of Alexandria, a man named
Athanasius, began arguing over the matter even as the Nicene Creed was being signed;
"Arianism" became a catch-word from that time onward for anyone who didn't hold
to the doctrine of the Trinity.
It wasn't until 451, at the Council of Chalcedon that, with the
approval of the Pope, the Nicene/ Constantinople Creed was set as authoritative. Debate on
the matter was no longer tolerated; to speak out against the Trinity was now considered
blasphemy, and such earned stiff sentences that ranged from mutilation to death.
Christians now turned on Christians, maiming and slaughtering thousands because of a
difference of opinion.
Debate Continues
Brutal punishments and even death did not stop the controversy over the
doctrine of the Trinity, however, and the said controversy continues even today.
The majority of Christians, when asked to explain this fundamental
doctrine of their faith, can offer nothing more than "I believe it because I was told
to do so." It is explained away as "mystery" -- yet the Bible says in I
Corinthians 14:33 that "... God is not the author of confusion ..."
The Unitarian denomination of Christianity has kept alive the teachings
of Arius in saying that God is one; they do not believe in the Trinity. As a result,
mainstream Christians abhor them, and the National Council of Churches has refused their
admittance. In Unitarianism, the hope is kept alive that Christians will someday return to
the preachings of Jesus: "... Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt
thou serve." (Luke 4:8)
Islam and the Matter of the Trinity
While Christianity may have a problem defining the essence of God, such
is not the case in Islam.
"They do blaspheme who say: Allah is one of three in a Trinity,
for there is no god except One God" (Qur'an 5:73). It is worth noting that the Arabic
language Bible uses the name "Allah" as the name of God.
Suzanne Haneef, in her book What Everyone Should Know About Islam
and Muslims (Library of Islam, 1985), puts the matter quite succinctly when she says
"But God is not like a pie or an apple which can be divided into three thirds which
form one whole; if God is three persons or possesses three parts, He is assuredly not the
Single, Unique, Indivisible Being which God is and which Christianity professes to believe
in." (pp. 183-184)
Looking at it from another angle, the Trinity designates God as being
three separate entities -- the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. If God is the Father
and also the Son, He would then be the Father of Himself because He is His own Son. This
is not exactly logical.
Christianity claims to be a monotheistic religion. Monotheism, however,
has as its fundamental belief that God is One; the Christian doctrine of the Trinity --
God being Three-in-One-- is seen by Islam as a form of polytheism. Christians don't revere
just One God, they revere three.
This is a charge not taken lightly by Christians, however. They, in
turn, accuse the Muslims of not even knowing what the Trinity is, pointing out that the
Qur'an sets it up as Allah the Father, Jesus the Son, and Mary his mother. While
veneration of Mary has been a figment of the Catholic Church since 431 when she was given
the title "Mother of God" by the Council of Ephesus, a closer examination of the
verses in the Qur'an most often cited by Christians in support of their accusation, shows
that the designation of Mary by the Qur'an as a "member" of the Trinity, is
simply not true.
While the Qur'an does condemn both trinitarianism (the Qur'an 4:171;
5:73) and the worship of Jesus and his mother Mary (the Qur'an 5:116), nowhere does it
identify the actual three components of the Christian Trinity. The position of the Qur'an
is that WHO or WHAT comprises this doctrine is not important; what is important is that
the very notion of a Trinity is an affront against the concept of One God.
In conclusion, we see that the doctrine of the Trinity is a concept
conceived entirely by man; there is no sanction whatsoever from God to be found regarding
the matter simply because the whole idea of a Trinity of divine beings has no place in
monotheism. In the Qur'an, God's Final Revelation to mankind, we find His stand quite
clearly stated in a number of eloquent passages,
"... your God is One God: whoever expects to meet his Lord, let
him work righteousness, and, in the worship of his Lord, admit no one as partner."
(the Qur'an 18:110)
"... take not, with God, another object of worship, lest you
should be thrown into Hell, blameworthy and rejected." (the Qur'an 17:39)
-- because, as God tells us over and over again in a Message that is
echoed throughout ALL His Revealed Scriptures,
"... I am your Lord and Cherisher: therefore, serve Me (and no
other) ..." (the Qur'an 21:92)
THE HISTORICSL FALLACY OF ATONEMENT
Salvation can be defined as the deliverance from sin
and its penalties; the path to salvation, however, varies from one religion to another. In
Christianity, salvation is found through the Doctrine of Vicarious Atonement. Since human
nature is considered in Christianity to be wayward and sinful, this doctrine states that
Jesus "rendered full satisfaction" to God for the sins of man through his death
and resurrection. In a nutshell, Jesus took our place, and his death absolves us of our
sins.
This is contrary to what is found in the Torah where God says:
" ...every man shall be put to death for his own sin" (Deut. 24:16)
The matter of Jesus, as savior of mankind, is refuted in the Quran,
wherein God says that He "...has stamped them with their disbelief...for their saying
'We killed God's Messenger, Christ Jesus, the son of killed nor crucified him, even though
it seemed so to them..." (4:155, 157).
Salvation According to Jesus
Nowhere in the four gospels did Jesus explicitly state that he
would die to save mankind from sin. When approached by a man who asked what he could do to
gain eternal life, Jesus told him to keep the Commandments (Mat. 19:
16,17); in other words, to obey God's Law. To a similar question put to him by a lawyer,
as recorded in the gospel of Luke, Jesus told him to love God and his fellow man (Luke
10:25-28).
The role of Jesus is made clear in the Quran where God says: "Christ,
the son of Mary, was no more than a Messenger; many were the Messengers that passed away
before him...see how God doth make His Signs clear to them, yet see in what ways they are
deluded away from the truth" (5:75).
The mission of Jesus was not, therefore, to set up a new method
of achieving salvation, much less the founding of a new system of belief; as even the Bible
points out, Jesus sought only to take the Jews from their emphasis on ritual back
to that of righteousness (Mat. 6:1-8).
Paul of Tarsus
Like many Jews, Paul had no use for the teachings of Jesus, and
he himself persecuted the followers of Jesus for their unorthodox beliefs. This
zealous persecutor was turned into an ardent preacher, however, through a sudden
conversion around 35 CE Paul claimed that a resurrected Jesus appeared to him in a
vision, thereby, choosing Paul as his instrument for carrying his teachings to the
Gentiles (Gal. 1:11; 12:15,16).
Paul's credibility in any capacity is questionable, however, when
considering that: (1) there are four contradictory versions of his so-called
"conversion" (Acts 9:3-8; 22:6-10; 26:13-18; Gal.
1:15-17); (2) God says, in passages such as Num. 12:6,
Deut. 18:20 and Ez. 13:8,9 that revelations come ONLY from
Him, and (3) accounts of numerous disagreements between the other disciples and
Paul regarding his teachings are recorded in Acts.
Experience and observation had taught Paul that preaching among the
Jews was not feasible; he, therefore, chose to go to the non-Jews. By doing so, however,
Paul disregarded a direct command from Jesus against preaching to other than a Jew
(Mat. 10:5,6). In short, Paul set aside the actual teachings of Jesus
in his desire to be a success.
The Pagan Influence
Among the pagans of Paul's time, a wide variety of gods existed.
Although these gods had different names and were embraced by people from different areas
of the world -- Adonis from Syria, Dionysus from Thrace, Attis from
Phrygia, for instance
-- the basic concept in each cult was the same: these sons of gods died violent deaths and
then rose again to save their people.
Since the pagans had tangible savior-gods in their old religions, they
wanted nothing less from the new; they were not able to accept any sort of an invisible
Deity. Paul was quite accommodating, preaching therefore of a savior named Jesus
Christ, the son of God, who died and then rose again to save mankind from sin (Rom.
5:8-11; 6:8,9).
The Bible itself points out the error of Paul's thinking. While each of
the four gospels contain an account of the crucifixion of Jesus, these accounts are
strictly hearsay; none of the disciples of Jesus were witness to such, having fled his
side in the Garden (Mark 14:50).
In the Torah, God says that one who is "hanged upon a
tree" --crucified-- is "accursed" (Deut. 21:23).
Paul side-stepped this by saying that Jesus became accursed in order to take on the
sins of man (Gal. 3:13); in so doing, however, Paul set aside the very Law
of God.
The resurrection, wherein Paul says that Jesus "conquered"
death and sin for mankind (Rom. 6:9,10), plays such an important part that
one who does not believe in it is not considered a good Christian (I Cor. 15:14).
Here, too, the Bible lends little support to Paul's notions;
first of all, not only was there no eyewitness to the actual resurrection, but all
post-resurrection accounts are in contradiction with each other as to who went to the
gravesite, what happened there, and even where and to whom Jesus appeared (Mat. 28;
Mark 16; Luke 24; John 20).
Secondly, although Christianity states that the body following
resurrection will be in a spiritual form (I Cor. 15:44), Jesus had
obviously not changed, for he both ate with his disciples (Luke 24:30,41-43),
and allowed them to touch his wounds (John 20:27). Finally, as the
divine son of God in Christianity, Jesus is said to share in God's attributes; one
cannot fail to wonder, however, just how it can be possible for God to die...
In his desire to win souls among the pagans, Paul simply reworked a
number of major pagan beliefs to come up with the Christian scheme of salvation. No
prophet-- including Jesus himself--taught such concepts; they were authored
entirely by Paul.
The Ultimate Sacrifice
Long accustomed to making sacrifices to their gods, the pagans easily
grasped Paul's notion that Jesus was the "ultimate sacrifice" whose blood washed
away sin. A common ceremony during this time in various Middle Eastern cults, such as
those of Attis and Mithras, was that of the "taurobolium": a person
descended into a pit covered over with grillwork upon which a bull (or ram), said to
represent the pagan deity himself, was then ceremoniously slain. By covering himself with
the blood, the person in the pit below was said to have been "born again" with
his sins washed away.
It is worth noting that the Jews had given up sacrifice back in 590 BCE
following the destruction of their Temple. Paul's notions, therefore, were in direct
contradiction to both Old Testament teaching (Hosea 6:6) and even to the
teaching of Jesus himself (Mat. 9:13) which stressed how God desired
good virtues, not sacrifice.
While Paul stressed that God's "love" was behind the
sacrifice of Jesus (Rom. 5:8), the Doctrine of Atonement
instead shows a harsh Deity satisfied only by the murder of his own innocent son. Paul was
way off base here, for the Old Testament is full of references to the love and mercy of
God to man (Ps. 36:5-10; Ps. 103:8-17) revealed through His
forgiveness (Ex. 34:6,7; Ps. 86:5-7), of which even Jesus
spoke (Mat. 6:12).
Pagan influence in Christianity even extends to its sacrad symbol.
Although Paul calls the cross of Jesus "the power of God" (I Cor. 1:18),
reference works, such as the Encyclopedia Britannica, Dictionary of Symbols,
and The Cross in Ritual, Architecture, and Art point out that the
cross was used as a religious symbol centuries before the birth of Jesus. Bacchus
of Greece, Tammuz of Tyre, Bel of Chaldea, and Odin of Norway are just a few examples of
ancient pagan gods whose sacred symbol was that of a cross.
Original Sin
Central to the Doctrine of Atonement is Paul's notion that mankind is a
race of wrong-doers, having inherited from Adam his sin in eating of the forbidden fruit.
As a result of this Original Sin, man cannot serve as his own redeemer; good works are to
no avail, says Paul, for even these cannot satisfy the justice of God (Gal. 2:16).
As a result of Adam's sin, man is doomed to die. By his death, however,
Jesus took on the punishment due man; through his resurrection, Jesus conquered death, and
righteousness was restored. To earn salvation, a Christian need only have faith in the
death and resurrection of Jesus (Rom. 6:23).
Despite its prominent place in Christianity, the notion of an
"original sin" is not found among the teachings of any prophet, Jesus
included. In the Old Testament, God says: "...the son shall not bear the iniquity
of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son" (Ez.18:20-22).
Personal responsibility is also stressed in the Qur'an where God says: "...no
bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another...man can have nothing but what he
strives for" (53:38,39).
The doctrine of original sin gave Paul the means to justify pagan
influence in his scheme of salvation. Irresponsibility became the hallmark of Christianity
through this doctrine, however, for by "transferring" sins onto Jesus,
Christians assume no responsibility for their actions.
Salvation in Islam
By the seventh century, the doctrines conceived by Paul had been
embellished to the point where Christianity was not almost entirely a man-made religion.
At this time, God chose to send Muhammad as His Final Messenger in order to set
things straight once and for all for mankind.
Since God is Almighty, He doesn't need the charade concocted by
Christians in order to forgive man. In the Qur'an, God says we are all created in a state
of goodness (30:30); He has not burdened man with any "original sin",
having forgiven Adam and Eve (2:36-38; 7:23,24) as He forgives us (11:90;
39:53-56).
As we are all personally responsible for our actions (2:286; 6:164)
there is no need for a humanly concocted savior in Islam; salvation comes from God alone (28:67).
Thus did Islam seek to restore the true meaning to monotheism, for in
the Qur'an God asks: "Who can be better in religion than one who submits his whole
self to God, does good, and follows the way of Abraham the true in faith?" (4:125;
41:33).
The Religion of Man
The evidence is overwhelming that the concept of salvation in
Christianity--its Doctrine of Vicarious Atonement--came not from God but from man
via pagan rituals and beliefs.
Paul effectively shifted the center of worship away from God by
saying that Jesus was the divine agent of their salvation (Gal. 2:20).
In so doing, however, Paul set aside all teachings of God's prophets, and even the concept
of monotheism itself, since God in Christianity needs Jesus for His divine
"helper".
Take a Closer Look
With his very salvation at stake here, the Christian should take a
closer look at what he believes in and why. God says in the Qur'an: "O
People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion, nor say of God aught but the
truth. Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, was no more than a Messenger of God...for God is One
God; glory be to Him: far exalted is He above having a son. To him belong all things in
the heavens and on earth. And enough is God as a Disposer of Affairs." (4:171).